MCP
Dapr helps developers run secure, reliable, and durable Model Context Protocol (MCP) server integrations
Dapr supports MCP by using its service invocation API. Off-the-shelf Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients and agent frameworks (LangGraph, the official MCP SDK, custom HTTP clients) point at the local Dapr sidecar and reach MCP servers by App ID. Dapr governs the traffic with the same controls it applies to any other service-to-service call: App ID identity, access policies, HTTP middleware, mTLS, observability, and resiliency.
How it works
Both the agent and the MCP server run as Dapr apps, each with its own App ID. The MCP client directs requests to its local sidecar and sets the dapr-app-id header (or uses the full service-invocation URL). Dapr resolves the target by App ID, applies the policies attached to the MCP server’s App ID, and forwards the request.
For each call, Dapr can:
- Route the request from the calling app to the target app by App ID.
- Authenticate the caller’s workload identity using mTLS with SPIFFE-issued credentials. On by default.
- Apply access control policies defined for the target MCP server’s App ID — coarse-grained App-ID gating, plus per-tool authorization via OPA.
- Apply HTTP middleware on the inbound pipeline, such as OAuth 2.0 bearer validation.
- Capture observability — logs, metrics, and traces for the call, sliced by caller and target App ID.
Off-the-shelf MCP clients work unchanged — there is no Dapr-specific MCP SDK to adopt for this path.
Get started
Security at a glance
| Layer | What it controls | Reference |
|---|
| mTLS + SPIFFE identity | Every Dapr-to-Dapr call is mutually authenticated using identities Sentry issues and rotates automatically. On by default. | Dapr mTLS |
Configuration accessControl | Which caller App IDs may reach which MCP servers. Default-deny is supported. | MCP access control |
| HTTP middleware (bearer / OAuth2) | Inbound JWT validation on appHttpPipeline; outbound token acquisition on httpPipeline. | Authenticating an MCP server |
| OPA per-tool policies | Argument- and tool-aware authorization that inspects the MCP JSON-RPC body. | MCP access control |
For the threat-model framing, default postures, and what stays your responsibility, see MCP security posture.
Alternative: the MCPServer resource (workflow-centric path)
There is a second way to use MCP with Dapr — the MCPServer resource. This path turns MCP integration into a deploy-time concern: you declare each MCP server as a YAML resource, and Dapr discovers tools, manages connections, and registers a built-in durable workflow per tool. Calling a tool becomes “start a workflow.”
In exchange, you face the following tradeoffs:
- Requires the Dapr Workflow client. You must invoke MCP tools through the Dapr Workflow SDK, not through your existing MCP client.
- Off-the-shelf MCP clients and agent frameworks do not work with this path. If you use LangGraph, the standard MCP Python SDK, or any other framework that speaks the MCP protocol natively, you cannot use these guardrails — you would need to call tools through the workflow SDK and forgo your framework’s MCP integration.
- Scale considerations. Every tool call spawns a child workflow and writes to the workflow state store. If your agent is already a workflow (for example, a
DurableAgent), every tool call multiplies into a child workflow. - Workflow-client-only today. Driving
MCPServer-backed tool calls requires the Dapr Workflow client; off-the-shelf MCP clients cannot drive these flows in the current release.
Use the MCPServer resource when you specifically need:
- Argument-level RBAC, audit, or redaction hooks on a per-tool basis (
beforeCallTool / afterCallTool / beforeListTools / afterListTools). - Durable retries that survive a sidecar restart mid-call (backed by Dapr Workflows + Scheduler reminders).
- Per-tool observability slicing — one workflow name per tool, so traces, metrics, and audit logs are sliced per-tool out of the box.
- Your application already uses Dapr Workflows for the rest of its execution model.
- You accept that off-the-shelf MCP clients and agent frameworks will not work for these calls.
See the MCPServer resource page for the full comparison with the service invocation path and a step-by-step guide.
1 - MCP through Dapr service invocation
Run MCP clients and servers as Dapr apps and govern the traffic between them with App ID identity, access policies, bearer middleware, mTLS, and observability
Dapr lets you run Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients and servers as Dapr apps and govern the traffic between them with the same controls you already use for any other service-to-service call: App ID identity, access policies, bearer middleware, mTLS, observability, and resiliency.
Because service invocation speaks plain HTTP, the agent’s existing MCP client can target the local Dapr sidecar and reach the MCP server by App ID. Off-the-shelf MCP clients and agent frameworks work unchanged — there is no Dapr-specific MCP SDK to adopt on this path.
Why service invocation?
The service invocation path reuses Dapr primitives you almost certainly already operate, so MCP traffic gets enterprise controls without a new programming model:
- Zero MCP SDK lock-in. Any MCP client or framework (LangGraph, the official MCP SDK, custom JSON-RPC HTTP clients) drives MCP servers through the sidecar unchanged. Adopting Dapr is a deployment-time change, not a code change.
- App ID identity with mTLS by default. Every Dapr-to-Dapr call is mutually authenticated using SPIFFE identities issued and rotated by Sentry. The MCP server sees the caller’s verified App ID; you don’t need to bolt on a separate identity layer.
- Coarse-grained App-ID access control. A
Configuration accessControl attached to the MCP server’s App ID gates which agent App IDs may reach it, with deny as the default action so untrusted callers cannot reach an MCP server by accident. - Per-tool authorization via OPA. When App-ID gating isn’t fine-grained enough, an OPA middleware on the MCP server’s inbound pipeline inspects the JSON-RPC body, extracts the tool name (and arguments, if needed), and applies a Rego policy keyed by
(caller App ID, tool name). This brings per-tool authz to off-the-shelf MCP clients without an SDK change. - Declarative OAuth 2.0 / bearer auth. A bearer middleware on the inbound pipeline validates JWTs against the issuer’s JWKS,
iss, and aud claims. Outbound, a separate middleware acquires tokens for upstream MCP servers. All declarative, no code in the MCP server. - Built-in observability. Service invocation generates traces, metrics, and logs sliced by caller and target App ID — the same telemetry you already use for non-MCP traffic.
- Resiliency policies. Retries, timeouts, and circuit breakers attach to the MCP server’s App ID via a
Resiliency resource. MCP calls inherit Dapr’s resiliency primitives the same way other service-invocation calls do.
| Without Dapr service invocation | With Dapr service invocation |
|---|
| Each agent embeds an MCP client and a separate identity / authz layer | One identity stack for all service traffic, MCP included |
| Per-server bearer-token plumbing in the application | Declarative OAuth 2.0 / bearer middleware |
| Per-tool RBAC requires forking the MCP client | OPA reads the JSON-RPC body and applies per-tool policy |
| Observability bolted onto MCP traffic separately | Same traces / metrics / logs as the rest of the system |
How it works
Both the agent and the MCP server run as Dapr apps, each with its own App ID. The MCP client directs requests to its local sidecar and sets the dapr-app-id header (or uses the full service-invocation URL). Dapr resolves the target by App ID, applies the policies attached to the MCP server’s App ID, and forwards the request.
flowchart LR
CLIENT(Agent / MCP client)
subgraph Dapr
CID(mcp-client App ID)
POLICY{Access policy}:::decision
BEARER{Bearer middleware}:::decision
SID(mcp-server App ID)
end
SERVER(MCP server)
CLIENT-->CID
CID-->POLICY
POLICY-- allow -->BEARER
POLICY-. deny .->CID
BEARER-- valid JWT -->SID
BEARER-. 401 .->CID
SID-->SERVER
classDef decision stroke:#ed8936For each call, Dapr can:
- Route the request from the calling app to the target app by App ID.
- Authenticate the caller’s workload identity (mTLS with SPIFFE-issued credentials).
- Apply access control policies defined for the target MCP server’s App ID.
- Apply HTTP middleware on the inbound pipeline, such as OAuth 2.0 bearer validation.
- Capture logs, metrics, and traces for the call.
These features apply to MCP calls just like any other service-to-service call, with no changes to MCP client or server code.
Quickstart
Step 1: Run an MCP server as a Dapr app
A minimal MCP server using the Python mcp library:
# server.py
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
mcp = FastMCP("my-mcp-server")
@mcp.tool()
def get_inventory(product_id: str) -> dict:
"""Look up inventory for a product."""
return {"product_id": product_id, "stock": 42}
if __name__ == "__main__":
mcp.run(transport="streamable-http")
Run it as a Dapr app:
dapr run \
--app-id mcp-server \
--app-port 8000 \
-- python server.py
Step 2: Connect the agent (MCP client) through the Dapr sidecar
The agent’s MCP client targets its local Dapr sidecar’s service-invocation endpoint:
# agent.py
import os
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.client.streamable_http import streamablehttp_client
DAPR_HTTP_ENDPOINT = os.getenv("DAPR_HTTP_ENDPOINT", "http://localhost:3500")
MCP_URL = f"{DAPR_HTTP_ENDPOINT}/v1.0/invoke/mcp-server/method/mcp"
async def main():
async with streamablehttp_client(url=MCP_URL) as (read, write, _):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
await session.initialize()
tools = await session.list_tools()
print("Available tools:", tools)
Run the agent as its own Dapr app:
dapr run \
--app-id my-agent \
-- python agent.py
Alternative: set the dapr-app-id header on the MCP client transport instead of using the explicit /v1.0/invoke/... URL. Both forms work — see the service invocation overview.
Because both apps run on the same Dapr control plane, service invocation routes my-agent’s requests to mcp-server by App ID. No additional networking configuration is required.
Apply security controls
MCP tool calls flow through Dapr’s service invocation layer, so you can layer two independent security mechanisms:
- OAuth 2.0 authentication — a bearer middleware on the MCP server validates inbound JWTs against the issuer’s JWKS,
iss, and aud claims. Requests without a valid token are rejected with 401 Unauthorized before reaching MCP server code. See Authenticating an MCP server. - Access policies (ACLs) — a
Configuration resource attached to the MCP server’s App ID defines which agent App IDs may invoke it, with a deny-by-default posture. See MCP access control.
These mechanisms can be used independently or layered together for defense in depth. mTLS using SPIFFE-issued workload identity is on by default for all Dapr-to-Dapr traffic — see Dapr mTLS.
For the full threat-model framing and what the platform does versus what stays your responsibility, see MCP security posture.
When to use this path vs the MCPServer resource
This path is the right fit when:
- You use an off-the-shelf MCP client or agent framework (LangGraph, the official MCP SDK, etc.) and want to keep that integration unchanged.
- App-ID-level access control and HTTP-pipeline middleware are enough — you don’t need per-argument RBAC or hooks that observe the tool result body.
- You don’t already use Dapr Workflows, or you don’t want to introduce them just to call MCP tools.
Use the MCPServer resource instead when:
- You need argument-level RBAC, audit, redaction, or response filtering on a per-tool basis (the
beforeCallTool / afterCallTool / beforeListTools / afterListTools hooks). - You need durable retries that survive a sidecar restart mid-call.
- You want per-tool observability slicing (one workflow name per tool).
The two paths are not exclusive — you can use service invocation for most MCP traffic and switch a specific server to the MCPServer resource when its policy needs become argument-aware.
2 - Authenticating an MCP server
How to enable MCP client-side and server-side authentication
Overview
The MCP specification does not mandate any form of authentication between an MCP client and server. The security model is left to the user to plan and implement. This creates a maintenance burden on developers and opens up MCP servers to various attack surfaces.
While MCP servers lack identity, OAuth2 is a well established standard that can be used to properly authenticate MCP clients to MCP servers.
OAuth2 becomes essential when MCP servers are:
- Multi-tenant
- Remote
- Cloud-hosted
- Connected to confidential systems
- Performing privileged actions on behalf of a user
- Exposing tools that must be permission-gated
Dapr enables OAuth2 authentication between MCP clients and servers using middleware components.
Types of authentication
Dapr supports two critical authentication mechanisms for production grade deployments of MCP servers - Client-side and Server-side.
Client-side Authentication
The client initiates OAuth2 to obtain an access token and includes it when connecting to the MCP server.
This proves the user’s identity and permissions and is required for remote, sensitive, or multi-tenant MCP servers.
It ensures the server can trust who is calling and what scopes the client is allowed to use.
Server-side Authentication
The server validates the client’s token or, if missing or insufficient, triggers an OAuth2 login or scope upgrade.
This is needed for cloud-hosted or shared MCP servers, tenant-aware systems, and integrations that require user-specific authorization.
It enforces access control, isolates users, and protects privileged tools and data.
How to enable Client-side Authentication
Define the MCP Server as an HTTPEndpoint
Dapr allows developers and operators to model remote HTTP services as resources that can be governed and invoked using the Dapr Service Invocation API.
Create this HTTPEndpoint resource to represent the MCP server:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: HTTPEndpoint
metadata:
name: "mcp-server"
spec:
baseUrl: https://my-mcp-server:443
headers:
- name: "Accept"
value: "text/event-stream"
Define the OAuth2 middleware and configuration components
The following middleware component defines the connection to the OAuth2 provider:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Component
metadata:
name: oauth2
spec:
type: middleware.http.oauth2
version: v1
metadata:
- name: clientId
value: "<client-id>"
- name: clientSecret
value: "<client-secret>"
- name: authURL
value: "<authorization-url>"
- name: tokenURL
value: "<token-url>"
- name: scopes
value: "<comma-separated scopes>"
Next, create the configuration resource which tells Dapr to use the OAuth2 middleware:
piVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: auth
spec:
tracing:
samplingRate: "1"
httpPipeline:
handlers:
- name: oauth2 # reference the oauth component here
type: middleware.http.oauth2
Note
Visit
this link to read on how to provide secrets to Dapr components
Call the MCP server using an MCP client
Copy the following code to a file named mcpclient.py:
import asyncio
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.transport.http import HttpClientTransport
async def main():
# Default address of the Dapr process. Use an environment variable in production
server_url = "http://localhost:3500/"
# Create an HTTP/SSE transport with a header to target our HTTPEndpoint defined above
transport = HttpClientTransport(
url=server_url,
headers={
"dapr-app-id": "mcp-server",
}
event_headers={
"Accept": "text/event-stream",
},
)
# Create an MCP session bound to the transport
async with ClientSession(transport) as session:
await session.initialize()
tools = await session.call("tools/list")
print("Server Tools:", tools))
await session.shutdown()
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Run the MCP client with Dapr
Put the YAML files above into a components directory and run Dapr:
dapr run --app-id mcpclient --resources-path ./components --dapr-http-port 3500 --config ./config.yaml -- python mcpclient.py
The MCP client causes Dapr to start an OAuth2 pipeline before connecting to the MCP server.
How to enable Server-side Authentication
Define the OAuth2 middleware and configuration components
Define a middleware component the same as the client example.
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Component
metadata:
name: oauth2
spec:
type: middleware.http.oauth2
version: v1
metadata:
- name: clientId
value: "<client-id>"
- name: clientSecret
value: "<client-secret>"
- name: authURL
value: "<authorization-url>"
- name: tokenURL
value: "<token-url>"
- name: scopes
value: "<comma-separated scopes>"
Next, create the configuration component, with the modification of an appHttpPipeline field. This tells Dapr to apply the middleware for incoming calls.
piVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: auth
spec:
tracing:
samplingRate: "1"
appHttpPipeline:
handlers:
- name: oauth2 # reference the oauth component here
type: middleware.http.oauth2
Run the MCP server with Dapr
Put the YAML files above in components directory and run Dapr:
dapr run --app-id mcpclient --resources-path ./components --dapr-http-port 3500 --config ./config.yaml -- python mcpserver.py
Dapr will start an OAuth2 pipeline when a request for the MCP server arrives.
Alternative: inbound JWT validation with bearer middleware
To require that every inbound request to the MCP server carries a valid OAuth 2.0 token — without driving an OAuth2 flow on the server side — attach middleware.http.bearer to the MCP server’s appHttpPipeline. The middleware validates the token’s signature, issuer, and audience against a JWKS endpoint and rejects requests with missing or invalid tokens (401 Unauthorized) before reaching server code.
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Component
metadata:
name: bearer-validator
spec:
type: middleware.http.bearer
version: v1
metadata:
- name: jwksURL
value: "https://auth.example.com/.well-known/jwks.json"
- name: audience
value: "mcp-server"
- name: issuer
value: "https://auth.example.com"
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: bearer-server
spec:
appHttpPipeline:
handlers:
- name: bearer-validator
type: middleware.http.bearer
Combine bearer validation with App-ID-keyed access control for defense in depth: accessControl decides which callers may reach the server; bearer validation insists they present a live, signed token.
See also
3 - MCP access control
Define per-agent access control policies for MCP servers using Configuration accessControl rules
How to define per-agent access control policies for MCP servers in Dapr.
For the full accessControl schema and HTTP-verb-level controls, see Service invocation access control. This page applies that mechanism specifically to MCP traffic, with the patterns and trade-offs that matter for agents.
Overview
In a multi-agent system, different agents should have different levels of access to MCP servers. An analysis agent might be allowed to read data from one server but not reach a server that performs writes. An operations agent might call write servers but not destructive ones. Without explicit policies, any agent in your namespace could call any MCP server — a serious attack surface.
Dapr lets you enforce this using access control lists (ACLs), defined as part of a Dapr Configuration resource. ACLs identify callers by their Dapr App ID (which is cryptographically authenticated by SPIFFE mTLS) and allow or deny calls. The policy supports a deny default, so every access must be explicitly granted.
Dapr access control evaluates caller App ID → target App ID at the service-invocation boundary. It is the same mechanism Dapr uses for any other service-to-service traffic, and it gives you coarse-grained gating: which agents may reach which MCP servers at all.
MCP transports — streamable-http and sse — route all tool calls through a single HTTP endpoint. The tool name lives inside the JSON-RPC body (params.name), not in the URL path, so HTTP-path-based ACL rules don’t give you per-tool granularity on their own. For finer-grained authorization, layer an OPA middleware on the MCP server’s inbound pipeline — it reads the JSON-RPC body, extracts the tool name, and applies a Rego policy keyed by (caller App ID, tool name).
For workflow-centric, argument-level RBAC inside a single server, see the MCPServer resource middleware hooks.
How it works
When an MCP client invokes a tool, the request travels through Dapr’s service-invocation layer to the MCP server. The ACL policy is evaluated before the request reaches the application. If the calling App ID is not permitted, Dapr returns a 403 Forbidden and the call never executes.
The access control policy is attached to the MCP server’s App ID via a Configuration resource applied to the sidecar through --config.
Defining a policy
The simplest pattern uses Configuration accessControl with a default action and per-caller overrides:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: mcp-server-policy
spec:
accessControl:
defaultAction: deny # callers not listed below are denied
trustDomain: "public"
policies:
- appId: analyst-agent
defaultAction: allow # this caller is explicitly allowed
namespace: "default"
Apply the Configuration and attach it to the MCP server’s App ID when starting Dapr:
dapr run \
--app-id mcp-server \
--app-port 8000 \
--resources-path ./components \
--config ./config/mcp-server-policy.yaml \
-- python server.py
On Kubernetes, set the configuration on the pod by annotating it with dapr.io/config: mcp-server-policy.
| Field | Description |
|---|
defaultAction (top-level) | Default for any App ID not listed in policies. Set to deny for a zero-trust posture. |
trustDomain | Trust domain in which the policy applies. "public" covers traffic within a single Dapr namespace. |
policies[].appId | The Dapr App ID of the calling agent. |
policies[].defaultAction | allow or deny for this caller. |
policies[].namespace | The Dapr namespace the caller runs in (typically "default"). |
ACL changes take effect after the target Dapr sidecar reloads the configuration — restart the sidecar to apply.
Deny-all baseline
Start from a deny-all posture and grant access incrementally:
# config/deny-all.yaml
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: mcp-policy
spec:
accessControl:
defaultAction: deny
trustDomain: "public"
Attach it to the MCP server’s sidecar and verify that no caller can reach it. Then layer in allow rules by extending the same Configuration and re-applying it.
Allowing specific callers
To allow a specific agent App ID while keeping everything else denied:
spec:
accessControl:
defaultAction: deny
trustDomain: "public"
policies:
- appId: analyst-agent
defaultAction: allow
namespace: "default"
analyst-agent can invoke this MCP server; all other callers are denied at the service-invocation boundary.
App-ID gating is coarse — it controls whether an agent may reach an MCP server at all, but every tool on that server is equally reachable. For finer-grained (caller App ID, tool name) authorization, layer an Open Policy Agent (OPA) middleware onto the MCP server’s inbound HTTP pipeline. The OPA middleware reads the JSON-RPC request body, your Rego policy extracts method and params.name, and the decision is keyed by the caller’s App ID (propagated by Dapr as the dapr-caller-app-id header).
flowchart LR
AGENT(Agent / MCP client)
subgraph DAPR[Dapr sidecar - MCP server side]
ACL{accessControl<br/>App-ID gate}:::decision
OPA{OPA middleware<br/>tool-level gate}:::decision
end
SERVER(MCP server)
AGENT -- POST /method/mcp<br/>+ dapr-caller-app-id --> ACL
ACL -- allow --> OPA
ACL -. 403 .-> AGENT
OPA -- allow --> SERVER
OPA -. 403 .-> AGENT
classDef decision stroke:#ed8936The two layers compose:
accessControl rejects unauthenticated or disallowed App IDs before any middleware runs.- OPA inspects the JSON-RPC body of the allowed request and applies tool-level rules.
Enable the OPA middleware
OPA’s HTTP middleware ships with Dapr. To inspect the JSON-RPC body, set readBody: "true" and pass the caller App ID through includedHeaders:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Component
metadata:
name: mcp-tool-authz
spec:
type: middleware.http.opa
version: v1
metadata:
- name: includedHeaders
value: "dapr-caller-app-id"
- name: readBody
value: "true"
- name: defaultStatus
value: "403"
- name: rego
value: |
package http
default allow = false
# Per-tool authorization for MCP JSON-RPC traffic.
#
# `input.request.body` is the raw JSON-RPC payload, e.g.
# {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call",
# "params":{"name":"get_inventory","arguments":{...}}}
#
# `input.request.headers["dapr-caller-app-id"]` is the verified caller App ID.
body := json.unmarshal(input.request.body)
caller := input.request.headers["dapr-caller-app-id"]
# Allow MCP handshake / discovery for any allowed caller.
allow {
body.method == "initialize"
}
allow {
body.method == "tools/list"
}
# Per-tool RBAC on tools/call.
allow {
body.method == "tools/call"
allowed_tools[caller][_] == body.params.name
}
# (caller App ID → permitted tool names) policy.
allowed_tools := {
"analyst-agent": ["get_inventory", "get_schema"],
"ops-agent": ["get_inventory", "get_schema", "update_stock"],
"admin-agent": ["get_inventory", "get_schema", "update_stock", "drop_table"],
}
Attach the middleware to the MCP server’s app HTTP pipeline:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
metadata:
name: mcp-server-policy
spec:
appHttpPipeline:
handlers:
- name: mcp-tool-authz
type: middleware.http.opa
Restart the MCP server’s sidecar with the updated Configuration. Requests for tools not on the caller’s allow-list now return 403 before the JSON-RPC body reaches the MCP server.
Notes and trade-offs
- Body shape matters. The Rego policy assumes standard JSON-RPC over
streamable-http. Validate the shape your MCP server expects (especially batched requests, which arrive as a JSON array) and adapt the policy. readBody: "true" buffers each request fully in memory. For very large tool argument payloads, factor this into capacity planning.- Defense in depth, not a replacement. Keep the App-ID
accessControl policy in place — OPA’s job is the tool-level refinement, not the server-level perimeter. - Workflow-centric alternative. If you want argument-level RBAC, audit, redaction, or response filtering inside one MCP server and you’re willing to invoke tools through the Dapr Workflow client, use the
MCPServer resource middleware hooks instead.
Combining ACLs with OAuth 2.0 bearer middleware
ACL policies and OAuth 2.0 bearer middleware are independent enforcement layers — apply both to the MCP server for defense in depth:
- ACL — controls which agent App IDs are allowed to call which MCP servers (enforced by Dapr’s service-invocation layer using SPIFFE identity).
- Bearer middleware — validates that the caller presents a live, signed JWT from a trusted identity provider (enforced at the HTTP pipeline level, independent of App ID).
An attacker would need to defeat both layers: forge or steal a valid App ID and obtain a valid signed token. See Authenticating an MCP server for bearer middleware setup.
Troubleshooting
My agent gets 403 even though I added a policy for its App ID.
Verify the App ID in the policy exactly matches the --app-id the agent was started with (case-sensitive). Make sure the MCP server’s sidecar has been restarted to pick up the new configuration. Confirm the namespace field matches the namespace the calling Dapr app runs in.
I want to allow all operations for a specific agent.
Set defaultAction: allow at the policies[].defaultAction level for that App ID:
policies:
- appId: admin-agent
defaultAction: allow
namespace: "default"
I want to test with no access control first.
Don’t attach a Configuration resource with accessControl to the MCP server. Without one, Dapr allows calls from any App ID in the trust domain.
See also
4 - MCP security and trust posture
How Dapr enforces agent identity, authorization, and auditability across agents and MCP servers, and what stays your responsibility
Running agents in production raises three questions Dapr is built to answer:
- Who is this agent? Can a downstream service prove that a request really came from a specific agent, and not from impersonated or hijacked credentials?
- What may this agent do? Are there enforceable limits on which MCP servers the agent can call and which data it can read or modify — limits that the LLM cannot reason its way around?
- What has this agent done? When something goes wrong, can the platform produce a record of what happened, by which identity, in what order?
Dapr answers each of these at the infrastructure layer, so the answers stay consistent regardless of which agent framework, language, or LLM you use, and without requiring changes to MCP client or server code.
How Dapr answers the three questions
| Question | Dapr control |
|---|
| Who is this agent? | Every Dapr workload — agent App IDs and any MCP server you run as a Dapr app — receives a SPIFFE-based cryptographic identity that Dapr’s Sentry component issues, attests, and rotates automatically. All service-to-service traffic is mTLS-secured using these identities. No static API keys or shared service tokens are required between Dapr apps. |
| What may this agent do? | A Configuration resource with accessControl rules attached to each App ID decides which callers may reach it. Defaults can be set to deny, so an MCP server is unreachable until a calling App ID is explicitly allow-listed. A bearer middleware layered on the MCP server’s appHttpPipeline adds JWT validation on top — the LLM cannot reason its way around either control. |
| What has this agent done? | Every service-invocation call — MCP calls included — flows through Dapr’s data plane and is captured in logs, metrics, and distributed traces. Standard OpenTelemetry exporters ship the data to your SIEM, log warehouse, or tracing backend. |
Default postures
Dapr’s defaults favor refusal over permissiveness. None of the below requires you to “turn on a security mode” — they are how the platform behaves out of the box.
- No identity is implicit. An MCP server reached through Dapr service invocation is mTLS-authenticated using the caller’s SPIFFE identity. There is no anonymous service-invocation path.
- Access policies are declarative and explicit. An
accessControl block attached to an MCP server’s App ID with defaultAction: deny makes the server unreachable until callers are explicitly allow-listed. See MCP access control. - Secrets are never exposed to agent code. Credentials referenced by middleware components (issuer URLs, audiences, signing keys, OAuth client secrets) are stored in your project’s secret store and resolved at request time. The agent receives tool results, not credentials.
- mTLS is on everywhere. Sentry issues short-lived SVIDs to every workload and rotates them automatically. You don’t configure it per-resource.
Threat model
The failure modes below account for most of the security risk when agents operate in production. Dapr’s controls map directly to each.
| Failure mode | What it looks like | Dapr control |
|---|
| Privilege escalation | A sub-agent inherits unscoped credentials and acts beyond its principal’s authority. | Each agent’s App ID has its own SPIFFE identity and its own accessControl configuration. Authority does not propagate by inheritance; every hop is independently authorized. |
| Unauthorized tool use | An agent or unknown caller tries to reach an MCP server it isn’t entitled to use. | Configuration accessControl rules attached to the MCP server’s App ID enforce per-caller allow/deny at the service-invocation boundary. Denied calls are rejected by Dapr before they reach the MCP server process. |
| Jailbreaking | A prompt persuades the LLM to attempt an unauthorized action. | The LLM’s decision happens before the platform; Dapr’s authorization checks run after. A jailbroken LLM that tries to reach a forbidden MCP server still hits a deny from accessControl (or a 401 from bearer middleware) before any code on the MCP server runs. |
| “Agent who?” | A downstream service cannot confirm which agent originated a call. | SPIFFE workload identity is verified at every hop. The MCP server (if it runs as a Dapr app) or any downstream service the MCP server calls can read the caller’s identity from the mTLS connection or from claims in the validated JWT. |
| Secret sprawl | API keys appear in logs, prompts, or downstream agent calls. | Credentials used by bearer or OAuth2 middleware are resolved from the secret store at request time and never visible to agent code. SPIFFE SVIDs are short-lived and rotated by Sentry automatically. |
| No provenance | No verifiable record of who did what. | Every service-invocation call is recorded by Dapr’s observability pipeline — logs, metrics, traces — and shipped to your sinks via OpenTelemetry. |
What stays your responsibility
Dapr draws the trust boundary at the platform’s surface. Some risks live outside it.
- Prompt injection and LLM-layer attacks. Dapr enforces authorization at the service-invocation boundary regardless of what the LLM does, but it does not inspect prompt content. Defense against prompt injection — content filters, allow-listing, output validation — belongs in your agent’s pre-LLM and post-LLM layers.
- The security of the MCP server itself. When you connect to a third-party MCP server (GitHub, Stripe, an internal tool), Dapr secures the connection, not the server. Vet third-party MCP servers as you would any other dependency.
- Audit sink durability and integrity. Dapr emits observability data to your sinks; the long-term durability and tamper resistance of those records is governed by the sink you write to (your SIEM, log warehouse, immutable bucket). Choose a sink whose retention and integrity guarantees match your compliance obligations.
- Tool-level granularity at the service-invocation layer.
accessControl today is keyed by caller App ID and target App ID. If a single MCP server exposes both low-risk and high-risk tools and you need to grant access to some but not others, either split the tools across separate MCP servers (one App ID per server) so the policy boundary matches the trust boundary, or use the MCPServer resource middleware hooks for argument-level RBAC.
Identity model in one paragraph
Every Dapr workload — agent App IDs and the MCP server itself if it runs as a Dapr app — receives a SPIFFE-based cryptographic identity that Sentry issues and rotates automatically. mTLS between workloads uses these identities. When an agent invokes an MCP server through Dapr, the caller’s SPIFFE identity is bound to the request; the MCP server’s Configuration accessControl rules decide whether to allow it.
Defense in depth
The strongest production deployments layer multiple controls so that defeating one does not grant access:
- mTLS with SPIFFE identity — every call between Dapr workloads is mutually authenticated by default.
Configuration accessControl — App-ID-keyed allow/deny on the service-invocation boundary. Default-deny means new callers can’t reach the MCP server until they’re listed.- Bearer middleware on
appHttpPipeline — independent JWT validation against the issuer’s JWKS, iss, and aud claims. An attacker would need to forge or steal a valid App ID and obtain a valid signed token. - (Optional)
MCPServer resource middleware hooks — argument-level RBAC, redaction, and audit running as durable workflows. Useful when policy depends on the contents of a tool call, not just the caller.
See MCP access control for layering ACL + bearer, and MCPServer resource for the workflow-hook layer.
Next steps
5 - MCPServer resource
Declare MCP server connections as first-class Dapr resources for durable tool execution
Overview
The MCPServer resource lets you declare MCP (Model Context Protocol) server connections as first-class Dapr resources. When daprd loads an MCPServer, it discovers the server’s tools and registers a built-in durable workflow orchestration per tool. Calling a tool then becomes “start a workflow” — and Dapr handles the connection, retries, credentials, observability, and crash recovery for you. Your application never imports an MCP SDK or holds a long-lived MCP connection.
When to use this path
The MCPServer resource is not the default MCP integration in Dapr — most teams should start with the service invocation path, which keeps existing MCP clients and agent frameworks unchanged.
MCPServer is the right choice when you specifically need argument-level RBAC, audit, redaction, durable retries that survive a sidecar restart mid-call, or per-tool observability slicing. In exchange, you adopt the Dapr Workflow client to invoke tools — off-the-shelf MCP clients won’t drive MCPServer-backed tool calls.
Choosing between MCPServer and the service invocation path
Dapr offers two integration paths for MCP. The service invocation path is the default; MCPServer is the workflow-centric path. Use this table to decide which fits your needs.
| If you… | Use |
|---|
| Use an off-the-shelf MCP client or framework (LangGraph, the official MCP SDK, etc.) and want unchanged client code | Service invocation path |
| Want the simplest setup that works with any framework | Service invocation path |
| Need argument-level RBAC, audit, or redaction hooks on a per-tool basis | MCPServer resource (this page) |
| Need durable retries that survive a sidecar restart mid-call | MCPServer resource (this page) |
| Want per-tool observability slicing (one workflow per tool) | MCPServer resource (this page) |
The two paths are not exclusive — most MCP traffic can flow through service invocation, with specific servers switched to the MCPServer resource when their policy needs become argument-aware or when you want durable MCP interactions.
Why MCPServer?
MCPServer turns MCP integration into a deploy-time concern instead of an application-code concern. The benefits compound across the system:
- Zero MCP SDK in your app. Your application starts a Dapr workflow by name. Dapr speaks MCP to the server. Swap MCP servers, change transports, or rotate credentials without touching application code.
- Per-tool RBAC, audit, and redaction in YAML. Order-preserving
beforeCallTool / afterCallTool / beforeListTools / afterListTools hooks run argument-level authorization, rate limiting, PII redaction, audit logging, and response filtering as Dapr workflows. Set appID on a hook to route it to a centralized policy app, so one shared RBAC service governs every agent without each app embedding the policy. - Durable execution. Tool calls run as workflow activities backed by Dapr Scheduler reminders. If daprd is restarted mid-call, the scheduler re-delivers the activity to the new instance and the call completes — agents don’t have to implement their own retry/resume logic. Inside a single activity, transient connection drops are absorbed automatically: Dapr keeps one warm session per MCPServer (with keep-alive pings) and reconnects once on
ErrConnectionClosed before the workflow ever sees the blip. - Fast feedback for callers. Required-field validation runs against the cached JSON Schema before the MCP server is contacted. Missing arguments come back as a structured
mcp.CallToolResult{isError: true} immediately — agents and LLMs get an actionable error without burning a network round-trip. - Per-tool observability. Each tool gets its own workflow name (
dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool>), so traces, metrics, and audit logs are sliced per-tool out of the box. You see exactly which tool was called, by whom, with what arguments, and what came back. - Declarative authentication. OAuth2 client credentials, SPIFFE workload identity, and static-header auth are all configured in YAML. Dapr fetches and refreshes tokens, caches per-MCPServer HTTP clients, and never exposes raw credentials to your app.
- Scoping and multi-tenancy. MCPServers are namespaced and
scopes-restricted, just like other Dapr resources. One MCP server can be shared across many apps with different access policies. - Hot reload. Add, remove, or modify MCPServer resources at runtime — Dapr reloads them without a sidecar restart.
| Without MCPServer | With MCPServer |
|---|
| Application manages MCP connections, retries, and credentials | Declare YAML, Dapr handles the rest |
| Sidecar crash mid-call = lost call | Scheduler reminder re-delivers the activity, workflow resumes |
| Per-tool tracing/metrics requires custom instrumentation | One workflow per tool — built-in observability slicing |
| Each app hardcodes its own MCP connection logic | Single resource, shared across apps via scopes |
| Tool-call RBAC and audit logic embedded in agent code | Declared per MCPServer in YAML, enforced as durable workflows, centralizable via appID |
How it works
For each loaded MCPServer named <server>, daprd:
- Connects to the MCP server using the configured transport (streamable HTTP, SSE, or stdio).
- Discovers the tools the server exposes (one MCP
tools/list round-trip). - Registers durable workflow orchestrations:
dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.ListTools — returns the cached tool list.dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool> — one workflow per discovered tool. Each invokes the tool durably as an activity, with optional middleware hooks before/after.
Callers start these workflows through the standard Dapr Workflow API. Dapr Workflows takes care of scheduling, retries on transient failures, and resuming after sidecar restarts.
You don’t need to enable workflows separately — loading an MCPServer is sufficient. Dapr’s workflow engine activates as soon as any MCPServer resource is present, even if no SDK workflow client ever connects.
Start a CallTool.<tool> workflow with just the arguments — the tool name is encoded in the workflow name itself:
POST /v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool>/start
Content-Type: application/json
{
"arguments": {"city": "Seattle"}
}
Poll for the result with GET /v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/<instanceID>. The workflow output is an MCP CallToolResult — byte-for-byte the same shape as the MCP wire spec. Each entry in content is a flat tagged union (type discriminator + per-variant fields):
{
"isError": false,
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "Weather in Seattle: sunny, 72°F"}
]
}
Other content shapes are similarly flat: {"type": "image", "data": "<base64>", "mimeType": "image/png"} (likewise for audio); resource references use {"type": "resource_link", "uri": "...", "name": "...", "mimeType": "...", "description": "..."} or {"type": "resource", "resource": {"uri": "...", "mimeType": "...", "text": "..." | "blob": "<base64>"}}.
If the tool call fails at the MCP level (unknown tool, validation failure, server-side auth error), isError is true and the failure is described in content — the workflow itself completes successfully so the calling agent or LLM receives a structured error it can act on (retry, pick a different tool, or surface to the user).
If daprd restarts while the tool call is in flight, Dapr Scheduler re-delivers the pending activity to the new daprd instance and the workflow resumes — no application-side retry logic required.
POST /v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.ListTools/start
Content-Type: application/json
{}
Output:
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "get_weather",
"description": "Get current weather for a city",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}},
"required": ["city"]
}
}
]
}
Tool definitions are cached at MCPServer load time and refreshed on hot-reload. Subsequent ListTools workflow calls return instantly from the cache — no upstream tools/list round-trip — so agents that call ListTools repeatedly pay zero MCP-server latency after the initial load.
Transports
MCPServer supports three wire transports. Exactly one must be configured under spec.endpoint.
Streamable HTTP
The recommended transport for production use.
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: payments-mcp
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://payments.internal/mcp
timeout: 30s
SSE (legacy)
For MCP servers that only support the legacy SSE transport.
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: legacy-mcp
spec:
endpoint:
sse:
url: https://legacy.internal/sse
Stdio
For local MCP server subprocesses in development.
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: local-tools
spec:
endpoint:
stdio:
command: npx
args: ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"]
Built-in limits
Dapr applies a few hard limits to MCP server interactions so that a misbehaving or hostile MCP server can’t exhaust sidecar resources:
- Tool list pagination: at most 500 pages per
tools/list round-trip. A server that returns more is rejected at load time rather than silently truncated. - Schema cache: per MCPServer, at most 500 cached tool schemas, each capped at 1 MB.
- HTTP response-headers timeout: 5 seconds time-to-first-byte on every outbound request. SSE streams remain unaffected because the timeout only bounds initial header receipt.
These are intentionally not user-tunable — they’re sized for typical production MCP servers and ensure the sidecar stays bounded under adversarial input.
Authentication
HTTP transports (streamableHTTP, sse) support three authentication mechanisms. These are configured under the transport’s auth field.
Inject headers on every outbound request. Supports value, secretKeyRef, and envRef.
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://api.example.com/mcp
headers:
- name: Authorization
secretKeyRef:
name: mcp-token
key: token
auth:
secretStore: kubernetes
OAuth2 client credentials
Dapr fetches an access token from the authorization server and injects it automatically. HTTP clients are cached per MCPServer for efficiency. auth.secretStore controls which secret store is used to resolve secretKeyRefs anywhere under this auth block (and for static-header secretKeyRefs on the same transport). It defaults to kubernetes.
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://payments.internal/mcp
auth:
secretStore: my-vault # optional; defaults to "kubernetes"
oauth2:
issuer: https://auth.company.com/token
clientID: my-client-id
audience: mcp://payments
scopes: [payments.read]
secretKeyRef:
name: payments-oauth
key: clientSecret
SPIFFE workload identity
Dapr injects a SPIFFE JWT SVID per request. No secrets needed — Sentry issues the SVID automatically. The SVID is fetched fresh on every outbound request rather than cached in-process, so there’s no in-memory token cache, no refresh races, and no stale-credential window.
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://payments.internal/mcp
auth:
spiffe:
jwt:
header: Authorization
headerValuePrefix: "Bearer "
audience: mcp://payments
Middleware pipelines
Middleware hooks turn tool-call governance into declarative YAML enforced by Dapr Workflows. Optional hooks run in array order before and after tool calls and tool listing. See the examples below for the canonical patterns.
- Before hooks: if any hook returns an error, the chain stops and the operation is aborted.
afterCallTool hooks: errors fail the workflow — these hooks can act as authz gates that block the response from reaching the caller.afterListTools hooks: errors are logged but do not affect the result returned to the caller.- Mutating hooks: set
mutate: true to make the hook’s return value replace the data flowing through the pipeline (arguments before the tool call, result after it). Default is false (observe-only — the hook validates or audits but its output is discarded). mutate is not supported on beforeListTools.
Each hook is a Dapr workflow that receives a typed input from the runtime:
beforeCallTool input: { name, toolName, arguments }
afterCallTool input: { name, toolName, arguments, result } # result: bytes — JSON-encoded MCP CallToolResult
beforeListTools input: { name }
afterListTools input: { name, result } # result: bytes — JSON-encoded MCP ListToolsResult
name is the MCPServer resource name. arguments is the JSON object the caller passed. result is the JSON-encoded MCP-spec result (camelCase wire shape, byte-compatible with the MCP specification). Hook workflows deserialize it with the language’s MCP SDK or with plain JSON decoding:
# Python hook example
import json
def after_call_tool(ctx, input):
result = json.loads(input["result"])
is_error = result["isError"]
text = result["content"][0]["text"] if result["content"] else ""
...
Mutating hooks return the same shape they receive — modify, then return.
Worked example: argument-level RBAC
A common need is “deny this tool call based on what’s in arguments” — for example, refuse refunds above a threshold, block tools that touch a tenant the request doesn’t belong to, or reject calls whose payload matches a denylist. Wire a beforeCallTool hook with mutate: false:
spec:
middleware:
beforeCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: rbac-check
appID: policy-service # optional — see "Centralized policy app" below
Workflow body (pseudocode — language-neutral):
workflow rbac-check(input):
# input: { name, toolName, arguments }
if input.toolName == "issue_refund":
amount = input.arguments["amount"]
if amount > 10_000:
return error("rbac: refunds over $10K require manual approval")
if input.toolName in DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS:
if not input.arguments.get("dry_run", false):
return error("rbac: %s requires dry_run=true in this environment",
input.toolName)
return ok # mutate=false → return value is discarded; nil error means allow
A few choices worth naming:
mutate: false because the hook only decides allow/deny — it never reshapes arguments. (For PII redaction, you’d flip to mutate: true and return the cleaned arguments.)beforeCallTool because denial should run before the MCP server sees the request. An equivalent afterCallTool hook can also gate (after-hook errors fail the workflow), but you’ve already paid for the upstream call.- Caller-keyed RBAC (“who can call which tool”) belongs at the policy layer, not the hook — the hook input doesn’t carry caller appID.
Worked example: audit logging
After-hooks observe the result. Wire an afterCallTool hook with mutate: false to write an audit record without altering the response:
spec:
middleware:
afterCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: audit-logger
workflow audit-logger(input):
# input: { name, toolName, arguments, result }
# `result` is bytes carrying a JSON-encoded MCP CallToolResult; decode first.
result = json_decode(input.result)
emit_audit({
server: input.name,
tool: input.toolName,
args: redact(input.arguments),
succeeded: not result.isError,
at: now(),
})
return ok # mutate=false → result reaches the caller unchanged
Because the audit hook is itself a Dapr Workflow, the write is durable: an emitter restart between emit_audit activity start and ack does not drop the record.
Centralized policy app
When a hook sets appID: <other-app>, the hook workflow runs on the named remote Dapr app via service invocation rather than locally. A single shared policy app — RBAC service, audit logger, PII redactor — can govern many agent apps without each app embedding the policy. Update the central workflow once; every MCPServer that references it picks up the change without redeploying its callers.
spec:
middleware:
beforeCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: rbac-check
appID: policy-service
- workflow:
workflowName: redact-pii
appID: policy-service
mutate: true
afterCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: audit-logger
appID: policy-service
Examples: common patterns
| Pattern | Phase | mutate | Sketch |
|---|
| Argument RBAC | beforeCallTool | false | Inspect arguments, return error to deny. |
| Rate limiting | beforeCallTool | false | Look up budget keyed by toolName; return error when exhausted. |
| PII redaction (request) | beforeCallTool | true | Transform arguments, return the cleaned shape. |
| Audit logging | afterCallTool | false | Emit {toolName, arguments, result.isError} (decode result bytes first) to a state store / log sink. |
| Response filtering | afterCallTool | true | Strip / mask fields inside the decoded CallToolResult content, then JSON-encode and return. |
| Tool list filtering | afterListTools | true | Drop tools the caller isn’t entitled to discover, return the updated ListToolsResult as JSON bytes. |
Each pattern is a single workflow with the input/output shape from Hook input shapes above. See the MCPServer spec for the full middleware field reference.
Observability and access control
Because each MCP tool gets its own workflow name (dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool>), every standard Dapr Workflow telemetry surface — instance status, traces, metrics — slices automatically per-tool. No custom instrumentation required. Operators can build per-tool dashboards or alerts using the workflow name as the slicing dimension.
For access control, MCP workflows participate in WorkflowAccessPolicy the same way user workflows do. The policy is an allow-list keyed by workflow name + caller appID, so operators can deny or restrict who is permitted to invoke dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool> (or ListTools) from outside the daprd that owns the resource. Self-call exemption (caller appID equals target appID) keeps in-process invocations open by default. This is how a central agent platform restricts which agents can call which tools, even when many agents share a single MCP gateway.
WorkflowAccessPolicy and middleware hooks compose, they don’t overlap. WorkflowAccessPolicy decides whether a caller can start CallTool.<tool> at all — coarse-grained, appID-keyed, enforced at the workflow boundary. Middleware hooks decide what happens once the call is in flight — fine-grained, with full visibility into arguments and result. Use both: the policy as the perimeter, hooks for tool-call-level argument RBAC, redaction, and audit.
For agents that reach MCP servers through the service invocation path instead of the workflow client, the equivalent perimeter is Configuration accessControl attached to the MCP server’s App ID — see MCP access control.
Deployment topologies
Dapr Workflow’s cross-app routing means an MCPServer’s workflows don’t have to live on the same daprd as the calling agent — the workflow actor’s appID determines hosting. Three patterns this enables:
- MCP gateway — one dedicated daprd app loads many MCPServer resources (payments, github, internal tools, …). All agent apps invoke MCP workflows on this gateway. Centralized credentials, centralized egress, centralized policy, single place to rotate secrets. Combine with
WorkflowAccessPolicy to control which agents can reach which tools. - One-to-one — each agent app loads only the MCPServers it needs. Tightest tenant isolation, no cross-app dependency. Best fit when teams own their own MCP integrations end-to-end.
- Mixed — some MCPServers on a shared gateway (common infrastructure), some on individual apps (tenant-specific). Use
WorkflowAccessPolicy to gate gateway tools per-app.
MCPServer itself doesn’t add anything for this — it’s the existing Dapr Workflow cross-app routing. The takeaway: pick whichever topology fits your governance and isolation model; you don’t have to flatten everything onto one daprd to use MCPServer.
App scoping
Restrict which Dapr applications can use an MCPServer with scopes:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: payments-mcp
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://payments.internal/mcp
scopes:
- agent-app-1
- agent-app-2
Tolerating load failures
By default, an MCPServer that fails to load (validation error, unreachable endpoint, bad credentials) causes daprd to exit. Set spec.ignoreErrors: true to keep the sidecar running and log the failure instead — useful when one MCP server is optional or when other resources on the same daprd must remain available:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: optional-mcp
spec:
ignoreErrors: true
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://maybe-flaky.internal/mcp
When ignoreErrors is true and load fails, the MCPServer’s workflows are not registered, so calls to dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.* return ERR_WORKFLOW_NAME_RESERVED until the server loads successfully (e.g. via hot-reload).
6 - How-To: Use MCPServer resources
Use MCPServer resources to discover and call tools on MCP servers
This guide walks you through declaring an MCPServer resource, listing its tools, and calling a tool through the Dapr Workflow API. Dapr handles the MCP protocol, transport, authentication, and durable retries — your application just starts workflows by name.
Step 1: Define the MCPServer resource
Create a file mcpserver.yaml in your resources directory:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: my-mcp-server
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: http://localhost:8080
This tells Dapr to connect to an MCP server at http://localhost:8080 using the streamable HTTP transport.
Start a ListTools workflow using the Dapr Workflow API:
curl -X POST "http://localhost:3500/v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/dapr.internal.mcp.my-mcp-server.ListTools/start" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{}'
Response:
Poll for the result:
curl "http://localhost:3500/v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/abc123"
When runtimeStatus is "COMPLETED", the properties["dapr.workflow.output"] field contains the tool list. Each tool’s inputSchema is the raw JSON Schema for its arguments:
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "get_weather",
"description": "Get current weather for a city",
"inputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}},
"required": ["city"]
}
}
]
}
Each MCP tool gets its own workflow named dapr.internal.mcp.<server>.CallTool.<tool>. The tool name is in the workflow name, so the input only carries the arguments:
curl -X POST "http://localhost:3500/v1.0-beta1/workflows/dapr/dapr.internal.mcp.my-mcp-server.CallTool.get_weather/start" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"arguments": {"city": "Seattle"}
}'
Poll for the result as in Step 2. The output is an MCP CallToolResult — byte-for-byte the same shape as the MCP wire spec. Each entry in content is a flat tagged union with a type discriminator:
{
"isError": false,
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "Weather in Seattle: sunny, 72°F"}
]
}
If the tool call fails at the MCP level (e.g. unknown tool, auth error), isError is true and the error is in content. The workflow itself completes successfully — isError is not a workflow failure.
If your call is missing a required argument, you get the same isError: true shape immediately — Dapr validates against the tool’s cached JSON Schema before contacting the MCP server, so agents/LLMs see actionable errors without burning a network round-trip.
Step 4 (optional): Add authentication
Add OAuth2 client credentials to authenticate with the MCP server:
apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1
kind: MCPServer
metadata:
name: my-mcp-server
spec:
endpoint:
streamableHTTP:
url: https://mcp.example.com
auth:
secretStore: kubernetes
oauth2:
issuer: https://auth.example.com/token
clientID: my-client-id
audience: mcp://my-server
secretKeyRef:
name: mcp-oauth-secret
key: clientSecret
Dapr fetches a token from the issuer and injects it as a Bearer token on every MCP request. HTTP clients are cached per MCPServer for efficiency.
Step 5 (optional): Add middleware
Middleware hooks let you run authorization, redaction, and audit as Dapr workflows on every tool call — no agent code change. Hooks are wired in the MCPServer spec and registered as plain workflows in your application (or in a dedicated policy app via appID).
Step 5.1: Add an RBAC hook (deny on policy violation)
spec:
middleware:
beforeCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: rbac-check
Register a workflow named rbac-check in your application. It receives an MCPBeforeCallToolHookInput:
{ name, toolName, arguments }
name is the MCPServer resource name; arguments is the JSON object the caller passed. Return an error to deny; return nil to allow.
workflow rbac-check(input):
# Argument-level RBAC: inspect the payload and decide.
if input.toolName == "issue_refund":
if input.arguments["amount"] > 10_000:
return error("rbac: refunds over $10K require manual approval")
if input.toolName in DESTRUCTIVE_TOOLS:
if not input.arguments.get("dry_run", false):
return error("rbac: %s requires dry_run=true",
input.toolName)
return ok # nil error so tool call proceeds
The hook runs as a durable workflow — if daprd restarts mid-policy-check, Scheduler re-delivers and the decision completes.
Caller-keyed RBAC (“which apps can call which tools”) belongs at the WorkflowAccessPolicy layer, not the hook. The hook input doesn’t carry caller appID; the policy is. Use the policy as the perimeter and hooks for argument-level decisions.
Step 5.2: Add a mutating PII redaction hook
To transform arguments before they reach the tool — redact PII, normalize values, inject defaults — set mutate: true:
spec:
middleware:
beforeCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: redact-pii
mutate: true
workflow redact-pii(input):
# input: { name, toolName, arguments }
args = copy(input.arguments)
if "email" in args:
args["email"] = mask_email(args["email"])
return { name: input.name, toolName: input.toolName, arguments: args }
The hook returns the same shape it receives. The MCP server (and any subsequent hooks in the chain) sees only the transformed arguments.
For after-the-fact response filtering or audit logging, wire the same way under afterCallTool — see the overview examples for the full set of patterns.
Step 5.3: Centralize policy on a shared app
To run the hook on a dedicated policy app instead of locally, add appID:
spec:
middleware:
beforeCallTool:
- workflow:
workflowName: rbac-check
appID: policy-service # runs on the Dapr app named "policy-service"
The same workflow runs on the named app via service invocation. One shared policy app (RBAC, audit, PII redaction) governs many agent apps without each app embedding the policy. Update the central workflow once; every MCPServer that references it picks up the change without redeploying its callers.
See the overview examples for canonical hook patterns (RBAC, rate limiting, audit, response filtering, tool list filtering).